
Tidbit Archive
| Twenty years ago this month, on May 21, 1980, President Jimmy Carter
declared a state of emergency at Love Canal, a neighborhood in Niagara
Falls, New York. The announcement (actually the second emergency
the President had declared there) came a little over two years after a
local newspaper published a series of articles on toxic waste problems
in the area and residents became concerned about possible health problems
related to these wastes. The White House agreed to evacuate the families
living in the Love Canal area and provide them temporary housing until
new, permanent homes could be found.
Twenty years later, Love Canal remains a synonym for ecological disaster. The episode had an enormous impact on public awareness of toxic waste issues and seriously damaged the credibility of the chemical industry and regulatory authorities. It was the impetus for passage of the Superfund law through which abandoned toxic waste sites all over the country are being cleaned up. In 1989, Occidental Petroleum Corporation, parent company of the firm which deposited the wastes agreed to pay the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency $129 million to cover the costs of cleaning up the site. Occidental also paid many millions of dollars in settlement of the lawsuits by homeowners from the area. Nevertheless, numerous studies of health impacts of the contamination have been inconclusive and, apart from the land where the wastes were actually buried (which is covered under a mound of earth and fenced off) and its immediate vicinity, the neighborhood has been declared suitable for residential use. Homes have been refurbished and sold, and the community has been given a new name, "Black Creek Village." Many observers believe those involved in Love Canal over-reacted to the situation and that many of the subsequent clean-up activities supported under Superfund have had costs far out of proportion to their benefits. Much has been written about Love Canal. Few of the writings are as balanced as Allan Mazur's 1998 book, A Hazardous Inquiry. Mazur uses the unique approach of the classic Japanese film, Rashomon, and presents six accounts of the events surrounding Love Canal, ranging from that of the chemical company that deposited the wastes to the woman who led the campaign on behalf of the residents to the New York State Health Department, which was charged with evaluating residents' illnesses. In the end he concludes that while a "real hazard requiring a serious solution existed. . . . the solution applied was less efficient and more costly than it should have been." |
Links:Allan Mazur, A Hazardous Inquiry: The Rashomon Effect at Love Canal (listing in the Technology and the Future Bookstore).
The Love Canal Collection -- an archive of the university libraries at the State University of New York at Buffalo.
Love Canal -- case study materials from the Online Ethics Center for Science and Engineering.
Love Canal, USA -- web site based on a documentary film created by film maker and web designer, Jeff McCormack of Santa Monica, California.
Love Canal -- listing from the 6th edition of The Columbia Encyclopedia (2000).
Review of A Hazardous Inquiry in Issues in Science and Technology, by Sheila Jasanoff.
Review of A Hazardous Inquiry in Risk, by Thomas G. Field.
Other reviews of A Hazardous Inquiry.
The 20th Anniversary of Love Canal. A history, timeline and other materials created by the Center for Health, Environment and Justice, formerly the Citizens Clearinghouse for Hazardous Waste, an organization founded by housewife-activist Lois Marie Gibbs, one of the key figures in the Love Canal story.
"Learning from Love Canal: A 20th Anniversary Retrospective," by Lois Marie Gibbs (see above link).
Love Canal Health Study - August 1997. Description of a a follow-up health study of people who lived near Love Canal between 1940 and 1978 being carried out by the New York State Department of Health.
"What Price Love Canal? An Unhappy Anniversary," by Dr. Michael Kirsch -- a skeptical view from the American Council on Science and Health, an organization whose "top priority is to help Americans distinguish between real and hypothetical health risks." According to its web site, ACSH aims to separate the leading causes of disease and death from the leading causes of unnecessary anxiety and tries to ensure that both individual health decisions and public policies are based on sound scientific evidence."
"Despite toxic history, residents return to Love Canal." News story from CNN.com, August 7, 1998.